Bespoke independent decision reviews
You receive a structured written Independent Decision Review (IDR) of how decisions are made inside your organisation.
This is a bounded, written external review designed to help organisations understand how decisions are made — and where risk or uncertainty may be accumulating. It is intended to strengthen decision confidence under complexity.
The work focuses on judgement: how choices are framed, how uncertainty and risk are handled, and how patterns of decision-making shape outcomes over time. It is intended for situations where complexity, pressure, or consequence make simple answers or additional process unhelpful.
Download a full client pack here →
Context
This kind of work is already familiar in many organisations. Companies of all sizes routinely commission governance, risk, and decision-making reviews—often through major professional services firms. Here, you are offered a smaller, more bounded alternative that retains seriousness and independence without assuming scale or theatre.
What this is — and is not
The review is interpretive rather than prescriptive. You are not given instructions, certifications, or assurances. Instead, you receive a clear, independent view of what appears to be working well, where decision risk may be accumulating, and what may be worth closer attention.
How it helps
Engagement begins with a paid Discovery Review and Report — a self-contained piece of work that allows you to test whether the approach is useful before deciding whether anything further is needed. Where further analysis would be helpful, focused or fuller review options are available, shaped by the questions that matter most to you.
Examples
Examples of the kinds of issues a review may raise for further consideration include:
- Where important decisions are actually being made (formally and informally), and whether that is visible to the right people.
- How disagreement and dissent are handled under time pressure, and whether apparent consensus masks unresolved uncertainty.
- Whether decision criteria remain stable over time or shift in response to urgency, personalities, or external scrutiny.
- What kinds of risks are treated as background noise, and whether that noise is increasing without being noticed.
- How accountability works in practice: where responsibility is clear, shared, or quietly becomes diffuse.
- How past failures and near-misses are remembered, learned from, or avoided.
- How information is filtered as it moves upward, and what senior decision-makers are systematically not being shown.
Throughout, decisions remain yours. The purpose of the work is to support confidence in how you are deciding, not to replace leadership judgement. This work is typically commissioned by leaders, trustees, or senior teams who want an independent view without taking on a consultancy programme.
If you think this kind of review may be useful, and would like to know more, send us a message →
